The support.orcid.org website is on a UserVoice platform that has a different privacy policy from our other sites. You may view the details at http://support.orcid.org/tos
X

ORCID iDeas Forum

Thanks for your ideas. The process to turn an idea into an active part of the ORCID Registry is described in the article How are new features decided? (see link) While we want to get to every suggestion, our limited staff time means that some features will have to wait until future development cycles. We look forward to reading your ideas.

I suggest that...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

There are two ways to get more votes:

  • When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
  • You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
  • To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback
  1. Exporting citations

    - It would be good to allow export of citations from the public view
    - It would be good that the exported bibtex would be consistent in naming the author. One basic interest of orcid is disambiguation of authors' names. The entries coming from different sources are not homogeneous in formating names (sometimes leading to erroneous spellings). At least the author from the concerned Orcid page whould be formatted correctly. At least, the first name/last name split should work!

    13 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

      Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

      Regarding exporting citations from the public view:
      Presently one can create a print view only from a public ORCID record. Are you suggesting some other format?

      Regarding the exported BibTeX:

      Our BibTeX export tool exports the BibTeX already in your work’s metadata by default. If a third-party organization added a work to your ORCID record with a BibTeX citation that had different naming information, then the citation will include different information from our automatically-generated BibTeX.

      For more on exported BibTeX, see: https://support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/articles/1807552

      Warm regards,
      ORCID Community Team

    • Each work should show identifiers from all sources

      When a work has both Scopus and ResearchedID sources the UI shows either EID or WOSUID, depending on the primary source. But I as a user want to see all identifiers for each work. This would allow me to quickly find out which works were indexed by different citation indices.

      3 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        0 comments  ·  ORCID User Interface Ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

        Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

        This is something similar to what occurs when reading an ORCID record using the ORCID API. When querying the /record, /activities or /works section, all identifiers for a work are displayed. You can read more about this at https://members.orcid.org/api/tutorial/reading-xml

        As you note this is not the practice on the user interface at present. This is because a key principle of ORCID is that the party who adds information to an ORCID record is the party responsible for that information, and we do not add or edit that data. If all of the identifiers of a grouped work were to be displayed on the version of the preferred source of that work, then that would involve adding identifiers which a source had not asserted.

        As the ORCID record owner, you can use the “Make a copy” feature to make a self-asserted…

      • 3 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          1 comment  ·  ORCID User Interface Ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

          Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

          Are you suggesting that every section of the ORCID record should have an associated anchor link which is displayed to the user?

          Many thanks.

          Warm regards,
          ORCID Community Team

        • Sort should be able to be saved

          The sort feature is helpful but it cannot be saved. I would like to sort based on relevance (not necessarily date or alphabetically) but cannot save it for my profile. For example, I completed a PhD but later earned a masters in another field. I would like to list my PhD first since it is most relevant. If someone looked at my record they may erroneously think I only have a masters degree. Allowing me to save my sort for my profile would be very helpful.

          1 vote
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            1 comment  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

            Thank you for your suggestion for improving the ORCID Registry.

            Our understanding is that you are requesting the ability to do one of the following:

            1. Allow the user to personally reorder items in, e.g., an affiliation list in order to have one’s preferred item display at the top

            2. Allow the user to save a certain sort view as the default view in their personal record (/my-orcid ) and public record (/0000-000x-xxxx-xxxx)

            Could you please clarify which you are proposing? Many thanks.

            Warm regards,
            ORCID Community Team

          • work:url be included in the /record summary view

            For a work that has only a URL associated with it (particularly if it is entered manually), there are a number of places to enter it. If the URL is included as an identifier <common:external-id-type>uri</common:external-id-type>, it will be included in the /record summary view. If it is not included as an identifier, it will be included in the /work view as <work:url>. I'd like to ask that <work:url> be included in the summary view (or for work:url to be copied to identifier type uri) so as to avoid making multiple calls to pull back all possible identifiers for a given…

            6 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              0 comments  ·  * Metadata/Data Accessibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
            • add delimiter between multiple Acess Types

              Some trusted organizations add several access types and currently, these are listed with just a white space in between.

              "ScholarOne Manuscripts" is one example => "Read your biographical information Get your ORCID iD"

              In order to improve readability, please consider adding a delimiter like & there, or breaking such records into a small list:

              - Read your biographical information
              - Get your ORCID iD

              4 votes
              Vote
              Sign in
              Check!
              (thinking…)
              Reset
              or sign in with
              • facebook
              • google
                Password icon
                Signed in as (Sign out)
                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                0 comments  ·  ORCID User Interface Ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

                We’re going to add this to our list of improvements to consider for the future and will update here accordingly.

                Warm regards,
                ORCID Community Team

              • ORCID System should be technically more robust

                ORCID does not seem to be serious towards the authors identity except that of emails.
                ORCID is placental to research activities around the globe and therefore it deserves to have a global outlook strong ERP system that could ensure the academic worth of the ORCID as a researcher account. The article has been sent to the help desk. Best Regards
                Chandu

                1 vote
                Vote
                Sign in
                Check!
                (thinking…)
                Reset
                or sign in with
                • facebook
                • google
                  Password icon
                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                  0 comments  ·  Research Activities-Works  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                • Add Kosovo to the country list

                  Dear Madam/Sir,

                  Upon registering the location of where I have completed my bachelor studies, I witnessed that Kosovo was not on the list of countries.

                  I would greatly appreciate if Kosovo was listed in the list of countries in ORCID considering that the Independence of Kosovo is recognized internationally.

                  1 vote
                  Vote
                  Sign in
                  Check!
                  (thinking…)
                  Reset
                  or sign in with
                  • facebook
                  • google
                    Password icon
                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                  • Making "affiliation" more general

                    We are considering adding "affiliation" as a general term to describe the relationship between an organization and an individual and would welcome your feedback on this suggestion.

                    In the longer term this could be the top level of a hierarchy to describe an individual's relationship with an organization (affiliation = education, employment, membership (?), other?).

                    This would allow us to group all places together in the same way as "works" is already used as a single category.

                    56 votes
                    Vote
                    Sign in
                    Check!
                    (thinking…)
                    Reset
                    or sign in with
                    • facebook
                    • google
                      Password icon
                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                      11 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                      Thanks to all who have supported and contributed to this iDea.

                      This month we released for public comment a new affiliations model: https://drive.google.com/open?id=10k8Ccbiog5oKkM4mXd265t_rTDFc5gnJy4pIGOLNrjM

                      We are interested in feedback on which subtypes should be made available, example affiliations, the use cases for them and their international applicability. Feedback on the overall approach, the top level categories and the use of a fixed list of subtypes is also welcome. When giving feedback, please consider the following:

                      • Do the categories make sense?
                      • Are the subtypes useful?
                      • What is missing from the list?
                      • What shouldn’t be here?
                      • Where would your affiliations fit in the model?
                      • What distinctions are made in your locale?
                      • What issues does this model present?

                      Feedback period ends November 20, 2017

                      Warm regards,
                      ORCID Communtiy Team

                    • Improve grouping / deduplication of publications

                      When updating an ORCID record from various literature sources like Scopus, CrossRef, own entries, Pure, it happens easily that duplicates are not automatically being detected and hidden in the public view. Instead, you have to manually go through the list and hide duplicates. Only, if records contain the same doi the deduplication works.
                      Could this please be improved? Please try to establish a robust deduplication algorithm.

                      2 votes
                      Vote
                      Sign in
                      Check!
                      (thinking…)
                      Reset
                      or sign in with
                      • facebook
                      • google
                        Password icon
                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                        2 comments  ·  Research Activities-Works  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                        Hello,

                        Thanks for your iDea to improve the ORCID registry.

                        The way the ORCID interface works is that publications which have the same identifier (e.g. PMID, DOI) with the same “self” relationship are grouped together into one item. This way a publication isn’t listed multiple times if you added it from multiple sources, such as importing a publication from Scopus and ResearcherID. It looks like the problem on your record is that some of the items from ResearcherID were provided without an identifier.

                        If the identifiers are the same on two works which are not grouping, then the likely cause is due to the identifiers not sharing the same case (e.g. DOI: 10.0281/1234A.03 and DOI: 10.0281/1234a.03 ). Currently the ORCID Registry processes all identifiers as being case sensitive. This is a known issue — some identifiers are case sensitive, whilst others, such as DOIs, are not.

                      • BibTeX import feature should include a verbose error report

                        You make the bibtex import report errors when it reaches them.

                        3 votes
                        Vote
                        Sign in
                        Check!
                        (thinking…)
                        Reset
                        or sign in with
                        • facebook
                        • google
                          Password icon
                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                          1 comment  ·  Research Activities-Works  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                          Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

                          We have as flagged as a future improvement possibility adding more verbose error messages in response to BibTeX import issues. As we consider this feature, it would be helpful if you could suggest what information you would expect to see during the error report.

                          In addition, please note that generally we encourage you to import works using the machine-to-machine connections using our Search & Link wizards, such as Scopus, ResearcherID, EuropePubMed Central, and Crossref.

                          If you are experiencing problems with importing a specific BibTeX file, please get in touch with support@orcid.org and provide both the file as well as the system from which it was generated. There are some systems, such as EndNote, which require that you apply additional filters when generating the original BibTeX file, as those systems may include nonstandard or unsupported information in the BibTeX.

                          Thank you.

                          Warm…

                        • 3 votes
                          Vote
                          Sign in
                          Check!
                          (thinking…)
                          Reset
                          or sign in with
                          • facebook
                          • google
                            Password icon
                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                            1 comment  ·  Research Activities-Works  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                          • BibTeX Import Supports @String

                            When importing BibTeX, your parser is not recognising @String definitions or is failing to expand them appropriately. The import just fails with no guidance to the user.

                            Example:

                            @String { MVA = {Machine Vision and Applications} }

                            @Article{Khan.etal.2015,
                            Title = {Better than {SIFT}?},
                            Author = {Khan, Nabeel and McCane, Brendan and Mills, Steven},
                            Journal = MVA,
                            Year = {2015},
                            Number = {6},
                            Pages = {819--836},
                            Volume = {26},
                            DOI = {10.1007/s00138-015-0689-7}
                            }

                            Fails, but

                            @Article{Khan.etal.2015,
                            Title = {Better than {SIFT}?},
                            Author = {Khan, Nabeel and McCane, Brendan and Mills, Steven},
                            Journal = {Machine Vision and Applications},
                            Year = {2015},
                            Number…

                            1 vote
                            Vote
                            Sign in
                            Check!
                            (thinking…)
                            Reset
                            or sign in with
                            • facebook
                            • google
                              Password icon
                              Signed in as (Sign out)
                              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                              0 comments  ·  Connections with other systems  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                              Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

                              We will flag this for our team to look into for future development of our BibTeX parser.

                              You can help this process by joining our efforts. ORCID is an open-source project that relies strongly on community support. We welcome your contributions to improve our BibTeX parser: https://github.com/ORCID/bibtexParseJs

                              Warm regards,
                              ORCID Community Team

                            • Third box for filling in author's names

                              It would be a good idea to divide authors' names in three parts instead of two: for instance, Dutch authors often have insertions in their names: given name, insertion(s), last name. Insertions can be for instance "van", "de" or "van de", causing authors, as it is now, to be found under the V or D of the insertions instead of under the first letter of their last name. A solution could be a third or middle box, in which insertions can be filled in. That could also be used by people who want to use their middle name: alphabetizing for…

                              12 votes
                              Vote
                              Sign in
                              Check!
                              (thinking…)
                              Reset
                              or sign in with
                              • facebook
                              • google
                                Password icon
                                Signed in as (Sign out)
                                You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                2 comments  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

                                We’re going to add this to our list of improvements to consider for the future and will update here accordingly.

                                Warm regards,
                                ORCID Community Engagement and Support

                              • Improve display of publication details

                                If you view an ORCID record and click on Show Details next to a publication, the upcoming detailed view looks in many cases very unattractive. You often (or always) see the record first in a bibtex view which is cryptic and hard to read. Why not showing an ordinary html view, e.g. a PubMed-like view as default?

                                1 vote
                                Vote
                                Sign in
                                Check!
                                (thinking…)
                                Reset
                                or sign in with
                                • facebook
                                • google
                                  Password icon
                                  Signed in as (Sign out)
                                  You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                  0 comments  ·  Research Activities-Works  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                  Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

                                  The ORCID record is intended to be a record of your research output, affiliations, funding history, etc. We store limited metadata information for each item based on the information that you have added to your ORCID record, or that you have granted an ORCID member organization such as Europe PubMed Central to add on your behalf.

                                  The citation that is displayed in the ORCID is based on the citation provided with the work. We recommend that BibTeX citations be added to works. This enables you to have a verbose BibTeX citation when you export your works in BibTeX format, and it includes additional information than can be stored in the ORCID record, e.g. page numbers.

                                  Keeping the above in mind, if you have specific suggestions on how information could be displayed on the ORCID record, please let us know.

                                  Warm regards, …

                                • Allow persistent sign-in states

                                  Apparently users are being logged out after 20 mins of inactivity, when closing the browser or when integrated systems force it, see Twitter discussion at https://twitter.com/ORCID_Org/status/865153183219187713

                                  This makes ORCID extremely frustrating to use for many users, as one is basically forced to re-login each and every time one uses the website.

                                  There should be an option for "staying logged in", as most other websites (Facebook, Twitter, gmail etc.) offer, which will not log you out unless specifically requested.

                                  19 votes
                                  Vote
                                  Sign in
                                  Check!
                                  (thinking…)
                                  Reset
                                  or sign in with
                                  • facebook
                                  • google
                                    Password icon
                                    Signed in as (Sign out)
                                    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                    0 comments  ·  ORCID User Interface Ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                  • Review of work categories and types

                                    There have been several ideas related to the current work categories and types on the ORCID record and suggestions for addition and improvement. This thread will combine these ideas together, as well as serving as a place to discuss additional suggested categories or work types.

                                    By way of background: The current listing of work types (see https://members.orcid.org/api/supported-work-types) is sourced from the CASRAI Output Standards. We would now like to open a discussion about the best approach to adding future work categories and types with the ORCID Community, through our iDeasForum.

                                    Thank you for your suggestions to improve the ORCID…

                                    142 votes
                                    Vote
                                    Sign in
                                    Check!
                                    (thinking…)
                                    Reset
                                    or sign in with
                                    • facebook
                                    • google
                                      Password icon
                                      Signed in as (Sign out)
                                      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                      under review  ·  47 comments  ·  Research Activities-Works  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                    • display

                                      A recent blog post highlighted new features including an easy way to display one's ORCID on their web page.

                                      The user clicks a link and then copies some HTML code to embed in their page.

                                      But is there a way to include semantic markup of the ORCID in that code?

                                      I would guess that schema.org has some identifier namespace that could include the ORCID. No?

                                      Wouldn't that enhance the findability and usability of the person and their ID with very little effort?

                                      5 votes
                                      Vote
                                      Sign in
                                      Check!
                                      (thinking…)
                                      Reset
                                      or sign in with
                                      • facebook
                                      • google
                                        Password icon
                                        Signed in as (Sign out)
                                        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                        0 comments  ·  Connections with other systems  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                        Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry.

                                        We’re going to add this to our list of improvements to consider for the future and will update here accordingly.

                                        Warm regards,
                                        ORCID Community Team

                                      • Add rel="me" to "Display my iD" markup

                                        The new "Display my iD" feature is great. The markup currently includes:

                                        rel="noopener noreferrer"

                                        Please change that to:

                                        rel="noopener noreferrer me"

                                        (the word order is not significant; "me noopener noreferrer" would work if you prefer) as done elsewhere on the site as a result of:

                                        https://support.orcid.org/forums/175591-orcid-ideas-forum/suggestions/3271302-add-rel-me-to-links-to-users-websites

                                        2 votes
                                        Vote
                                        Sign in
                                        Check!
                                        (thinking…)
                                        Reset
                                        or sign in with
                                        • facebook
                                        • google
                                          Password icon
                                          Signed in as (Sign out)
                                          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                          0 comments  ·  ORCID User Interface Ideas  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

                                          Thanks for your suggestion to improve the ORCID Registry!

                                          We’re going to add this to our list of improvements to consider for the future and will update here accordingly.

                                          Warm regards,
                                          ORCID Community Team

                                        • Implement W3C's "Proposal for the Improvement of the Semantics of ORCIDs"

                                          Phil Archer, of the W3C, has written a paper [1] recommending some simple changes to ORCID's linked data, to make it more easily usable and to add semantic richness.

                                          [1] http://www.w3.org/2015/03/orcid-semantics

                                          (Idea originally posted on 15.04.2015 and merged by mistake http://support.orcid.org/forums/175591-orcid-ideas-forum/suggestions/3426459-make-the-site-validate-correctly-with-w3c)

                                          20 votes
                                          Vote
                                          Sign in
                                          Check!
                                          (thinking…)
                                          Reset
                                          or sign in with
                                          • facebook
                                          • google
                                            Password icon
                                            Signed in as (Sign out)
                                            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
                                            under review  ·  0 comments  ·  * Metadata/Data Accessibility  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
                                          ← Previous 1 3 4 5 6
                                          • Don't see your idea?

                                          Feedback and Knowledge Base