# ORCID Ideas Forum

Thanks for your ideas. The process to turn an idea into an active part of the ORCID Registry is described in the article How are new features decided? (see link) While we want to get to every suggestion, our limited staff time means that some features will have to wait until future development cycles. We look forward to reading your ideas.

## I suggest you ...

You've used all your votes and won't be able to post a new idea, but you can still search and comment on existing ideas.

### There are two ways to get more votes:

• When an admin closes an idea you've voted on, you'll get your votes back from that idea.
• You can remove your votes from an open idea you support.
• To see ideas you have already voted on, select the "My feedback" filter and select "My open ideas".
(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can vote and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can vote on it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

• Hot ideas
• Top ideas
• New ideas
1. ## BibTeX import is flaky

First, thank you for enable BibTeX import. This was a long awaited feature.

The BibTex import option is however rather sensitive to the details of the BibTex record, and fails when it encounters fields that it can't deal with. These are standard field such as:

month = may

or

date-modified = {2014-12-09T15:58:24GMT},

and the import simply fails without giving a detailed reason.

Secondly the import does not translate special characters correctly, such as umlauts or accented letters, for example

{\"u} becomes Ã¼ rather than ü

Btw, Imports from CrossRef suffer from the same problem

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Hi Ulli,

We’ve been following up with the specific issues causing import to fail via support. But I’m marking this ticket as planned to address your point about special characters not importing correctly. That’s on our list to fix in the new year and I’ll update this idea once we’ve had a chance to improve how our BibTeX parser handles these characters.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

In physics (as well as other fields), it is common for publications to be distributed via the arXiv (http://arxiv.org/). This is entirely open access, and so is a wonderful resource. It would be great if academic publications could be linked to the arXiv versions. This is not only so that the authors can associated with their work, but also so that anyone reading the ORCID profile can find links to the publications that they can read without journal subscriptions. The NASA ADS (http://adswww.harvard.edu/) and Google Scholar already do a good job of pairing publications with their…

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## sort entries in the education, employment and funding sections by end date instead of start date

If there are two or more concurrent grants, for example, sorting by end date usually produces a more reasonable order.

Consider the following situation:
Grant 1: $500 000, 01/2014 - 12/2016 Grant 2:$15 000, 12/2014-04/2015

Those are now displayed in the order Grant 2, Grant 1 and will be displayed this way even in mid-2016, when no one cares about Grant 2 anymore. The same is true for the tab education, where e.g. a short stay at a foreign university always pops to the top.

Sorting by end dates solves these issues, because the topmost entry is either the…

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

We appreciate you raising this issue and have added it to our list of items to address. As this is a minor issue we aren’t prioritizing it, but it’s on our list to fix in the next few months.

Thanks,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

http://orcid.org/ it says

12/08/2014

could be 12 August or December 8

use non-ambiguous ISO 8601 format instead. Also avoids bias towards US or European format.

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## oauth authentication screen: allow Enter key to Authorize

In the oauth authorization page it would be great if the 'Enter' key allowed to Authorize after inputting email and password.

Now that we are using ORCID as an authentication method, this would speed up the user login. We have received this complaint in several occasions from our users so it would be a very good addition.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Thanks for the great suggestion! I’ve added this to our development list for the next couple months. We have a few big items coming out shortly, but once that is once those are done our developers look into allowing the enter key to authorize.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

• ## remove the "-" from the display of IDs to make displayed ORCID a subset of ISNI.

https://orcid.org/blog/2013/04/22/orcid-and-isni-issue-joint-statement-interoperation-april-2013

"The ORCID iD is compatible in format with the ISNI ISO Standard (ISO 27729)." - compatible? What does that mean?

http://support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/articles/116780-structure-of-the-orcid-identifier
"The ORCID iD is a URI with a 16-digit number that is compatible with the ISO Standard (ISO 27729)"

But then you email me

"Your sixteen digit ORCID identifier is 0000-0002-5945-7502"

0000-0002-5945-7502 is not sixteen digit.

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Improving BibTeX import - for large bibliographies

First thanks for releasing the BibTeX import. Our users are also happy to see the availability of BibTex import. Some with very large bibliographies are however complaining about have to accept (save) every single record.

It would be great if you somehow to make it possible to accept all, or accept selected records from an BibTeX import file, without having to: open, save to accept every single record.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Hi Mikael,

Thanks for the suggestion, this is on our list for 2015 already. There’s a little development work involved as we can’t have an automatic save for BibTeX citations that are missing required fields, but we are working on a “save all” option that works for every valid reference in a BibTeX file. I’ll update this idea when that functionality is ready.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

• ## Use mathjax for proper display of Tex formulas/equations in Works titles

The Tex formulas in titles and abstracts do not appear properly in the public profile pages (example: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0219-2750). Using Mathjax may be a solution for this problem.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Thanks for the suggestion. We agree that adding a way to mark up text based formulas would be a nice feature. However, it won’t fit in our near term development plan as right now we’re focused on release new features to make the entire Registry more robust. We’ll review this suggestion once we have more developer time and as the demand grows.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

• ## use ISO 8601 in the forum

currently in the forum the US format is used, e.g. "December 16, 2014"

Use the international ISO 8601 format instead.

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## use ISO 8601 in the blog

https://orcid.org/blog/2014/12/11/fuelling-your-cris-orcid-ids-tool-research-intelligence

"Submitted by Ed Simons on Thu, 12/11/2014 - 17:42"

Could be 12 November or December 11.

Use the not ambiguous international ISO 8601 format instead.

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## use ISO 8601 on orcid.org/statistics

At the bottom of
https://orcid.org/statistics it says

"Statistics as of: 2014-Dec-12"

Could you change it so it conforms to ISO 8601?

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## You add marking patterns for serial publications

The YYYY-MM-DD marking pattern is too restrictive. It does not allow proper entry of journals which use other marking patterns, for example a year volume/number pattern. Here is an example:

Science & Technology Libraries, Vol. 26, No. 3/4, 2006, 111-135

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Save collapse state of sections in profile

When I log in, I'm interested in my works, so I collapse the sections above that. I have to do this every time. Just remember my preferences for each section.

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)
• ## Provide authentication with OpenID Connect

Since plain oauth for accessing the API is primarily for authorization, it would be great to be able to use ORCID as an authentication provider with an open standard as OpenID Connect. Users could then easily log into other research platforms using their ORCID account.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Hi,

This is a great suggestion and one we support. We have integration with OpenID on our list of 2015 projects. I’ll update this idea as we make progress.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

• ## Preserving oauth authorization

Right now, if one integrates ORCID as an authentication provider, via oauth, the user coming to a service to authenticate, is redirected to ORCID to login and is then asked to authorized the given service.

This procedure currently happens *every* time a user authenticates.
It would be great that the user is not asked to authorize a given application upon every login, rather your service would keep track of which application have been authorized and let the user cancel them from their account service.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Hi,

This is an issue we’re aware of and it’s on our roadmap to address within the next 6th months. I’ll update this suggestion as we make progress on it.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

• ## Co-branding on ORCID emails to integrators' user communities

As a soon to be integrator, I think it would be valuable to co-brand on emails sent by ORCID to our users. All our information providers allow us to state that the content is brought to you by NAME OF LIBRARY or LOGO of Library on their respective websites/homepages. I believe that we should implement something similar with ORCID…. Perhaps the wording could be ...brought to you by NAME OF LIBRARY or ORGANIZATION in partnership with ORCID. Co-branding will draw attention to our users that there is a definite collaboration between their library/institution and ORCID.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Hi Donna,

Thanks for the suggestion. We can’t customize all emails ORCID sends (like reset password messages, or notifications that your record has been updated) based on if a researcher is associated with one of our members. However, for premium members we do offer an option to customize the claim email that is sent if an institution creates a record for a researcher. See http://support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/articles/385420

But we are intrigued by your suggestion about including member logos on websites, like your other information providers. In 2015 we’ll look at the possibility of allowing members to add a logo to the ORCID records of their researchers (probably in the affiliation sections). I’ll update this iDea once we know if that is something we’ll be able to pursue

I also noticed that your institution isn’t listed on the ORCID member’s page yet. If you send us a logo and description (to support@orcid.org)…

• ## Offer JSON-LD representation

JSON-LD provides a nice combination of a simple syntax format while being linked data at the same time. Being able to get JSON-LD for an ORCID identifier would help both semantic web use cases as well as simpler one-off uses.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Hi,

Thanks for the suggestion. In 2015 ORCID will officially be supporting a relational model. At that time JSON-LD will be considered.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

• ## Allow authors to list related work (e.g. a dataset or supplementary material) under a publication in a related works or tabbed section.

At the moment every work shows up the same. It would be great if you could link subsidiary or related works under a publication, for example, a link to the Dryad or Figshare source for the underlying data or to a preprint repository for an author manuscript.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

This is a great suggestion and one that’s in our long term plan. In addition to linking works we want to be able to link funding items that may have support the works and create other connections between items on an ORCID record. While we won’t be able to add this soon as we have so much other functionality we’re working on, this is part of the plan for ORCID.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

• ## better description for scope paramteter

http://support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/articles/120107 lists scope and links to a page which doesn't make it clear what valid values are. I spent a day using scope=AUTHENTICATE and getting an unhelpful error messgage. I had to find example code to discover it should be scope=/authenticate and that I'd done everything else right!

1 vote
Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Hi,

Sorry you had trouble with using our scopes. I don’t think there’s a way to change the error message as the call fails entirely without a valid scope. But do you have a specific suggestion on how we could change our document to make the scope values more clear? We do list all scopes with the leading slash at http://support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/articles/120162 and when using them in examples.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

• ## Need way for end user to export users own complete record (xml/yaml/json okay).

Need way for end user to export users own complete record (xml/yaml/json okay).

This is for archival/backup/data verification/comparision and other purposes.

Bonus points for also allowing an edited complete record to be uploaded to replace the current one.

Note: This is probably possible from the API, but there should be a visible user driven methos to do this.

Vote
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
Signed in as (Sign out)
You have left! (?) (thinking…)

Hi,

Thanks for this suggestion. As you mentioned, a user can access their ORCID record via the ORCID API- instructions on how to do that are at http://support.orcid.org/knowledgebase/articles/132271-retrieving-data-with-the-public-api

We like your suggestion of offering a way to run this export in the user interface as well, but we will not be able to work on that right now. Our current priority is getting information into ORCID records and that’s where we’re focusing our development.

Best,
-Catalina
ORCID Support

← Previous 1 3 4